Tribal Water Settlements IndexPublic records · cited to source
Home/Case law/Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Coachella Valley Water District

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Coachella Valley Water District

849 F.3d 1262 · 2017 · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Holding

The Ninth Circuit held that the Winters doctrine does not distinguish between surface water and groundwater: when the United States established the Agua Caliente Reservation in the arid Coachella Valley it impliedly reserved appurtenant water sources, including the groundwater of the Coachella Valley aquifer, and that federal reserved right preempts conflicting state water rights and survives the Tribe's historical non-use.

"When the well's dry, we know the worth of water" — Benjamin Franklin, as quoted at the opening of the Ninth Circuit's opinion (Tallman, J.)

Why it matters for settlements

First federal appellate holding squarely extending tribal reserved water rights to groundwater, a pressure point for basins where surface supplies are fully appropriated.

Interlocutory appeal, Phase I of trifurcated litigation (existence of the groundwater right only). Same CourtListener HTML interstitial caveat.

Sources


Related: doctrine overview · all cases · settlements table